<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rantings of a Sandmonkey &#187; American politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sandmonkey.org/category/american-politics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sandmonkey.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>My presidential campaign gaining traction</title>
		<link>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/07/03/my-presidential-campaign-gaining-traction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/07/03/my-presidential-campaign-gaining-traction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Sandmonkey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[American politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ego]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandmonkey.org/?p=4964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even the Media is starting to notice,  and while you are at it, join the campaign that&#39;s changing the nation.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even the Media is <a href="http://www.news3online.com/index.php?code=433k5qU09VB0BX45T4yh">starting to notice,</a>  and while you are at it, join the campaign that&#39;s changing the nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/07/03/my-presidential-campaign-gaining-traction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We are all Hussein</title>
		<link>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/06/30/we-are-all-hussein/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/06/30/we-are-all-hussein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Sandmonkey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[American politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandmonkey.org/?p=4960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And they say Obama followers are not cultish!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And they say Obama followers are <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/29/us/politics/29hussein.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;adxnnlx=1214832625-HO3p7WlEp5O9ltfjfQrJ+w">not cultish!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/06/30/we-are-all-hussein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slowly losing his Halo</title>
		<link>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/06/20/slowly-losing-his-halo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/06/20/slowly-losing-his-halo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Sandmonkey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[American politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandmonkey.org/?p=4952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First AIPAC, and now this!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First AIPAC, and now <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080619/ap_on_el_pr/obama_money_analysis;_ylt=Atq0KIttO8lpSy3Q5QjfH.2s0NUE">this!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/06/20/slowly-losing-his-halo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Special candidate</title>
		<link>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/06/17/the-special-candidate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/06/17/the-special-candidate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 07:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Sandmonkey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[American politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandmonkey.org/?p=4949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hillary wasn&#39;t only the first woman with a strong chance of being nominated for President, as Hitchens reminds us:

Posterity may well remember the Hillary Clinton campaign as the nearest
that a member of the female gender had thus far gotten to the
nomination of a major political party. But the episode will be recalled
for many other salient [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary wasn&#39;t only the first woman with a strong chance of being nominated for President, as Hitchens <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2193684/">reminds us:</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Posterity may well remember the Hillary Clinton campaign as the nearest<br />
that a member of the female gender had thus far gotten to the<br />
nomination of a major political party. But the episode will be recalled<br />
for many other salient features as well. The first time that the wife<br />
of an ex-president had leveraged her first-lady status into a<br />
senatorial seat and then a bid for the presidency. The first time that<br />
the candidate&#39;s spouse (and campaigner in chief) was a person who had<br />
been disbarred for perjury and impeached for&mdash;among other<br />
things&mdash;obstruction of justice. The first time since the 1960s that a<br />
Democrat seeking the nomination had implicitly relied on a &quot;Southern<br />
strategy&quot; of appealing to the rancor of the &quot;white working class.&quot; The<br />
first time since the lachrymose Ed Muskie that a candidate&#39;s eyes had<br />
welled up with tears in New Hampshire. The first time that a woman<br />
candidate was married to a man who had been believably accused of rape<br />
and sexual harassment.<br />
The first time that a candidate had said of her half-African-American<br />
rival that he was not a member of the Muslim faith &quot;as far as I know.&quot;<br />
The first time that the loser in the delegate count had failed to<br />
congratulate or even acknowledge the winner on the night of his<br />
historic victory.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But please remember, she lost because she was a woman. Oh, and white.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/06/17/the-special-candidate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama and Affirmative Action</title>
		<link>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/06/17/obama-and-affirmative-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/06/17/obama-and-affirmative-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 07:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Sandmonkey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[American politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandmonkey.org/?p=4946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[* This convo happened between me and my American friend E, right around the time Obama clinched the nomination, but before he ruined things by kissing AIPAC ass*
Me: So Obama finally won the nomination. No more Hillary.

E: About damn time.&#160;
Me: True. Now, I have a question: Can affirmative action be used By Obama in this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* This convo happened between me and my American friend E, right around the time Obama clinched the nomination, but before he ruined things by kissing AIPAC ass*</p>
<p>Me: So Obama finally won the nomination. No more Hillary.
</p>
<p>E: About damn time.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Me: True. Now, I have a question: Can affirmative action be used By Obama in this election?</p>
<p>E: Shut it.</p>
<p>Me: No, for real.. i mean he is applying for a job, and it&#39;s him versus a white dude. Does he get extra votes for being black?</p>
<p>E: Dude, you are being stupid. Shut up!
</p>
<p>Me: Ok, fine, but what if he and McCain split the electoral college votes equally, does he then get some extra votes?&nbsp;</p>
<p>E: NO. He wouldn&#39;t, and you know it. Stop it!</p>
<p>Me: Ok, fine. Seriously now. If Obama wins, is there still an argument for affirmative action? I mean, if he wins the majority of the votes, then it could be argued that the majority of the country isn&#39;t racist, right? And if this is the case, then the racists have become a minority, so a government policy to combat nationwide racism against Blacks- with the presence of a Black President in Office- would no longer be necessary, no?</p>
<p>E: Nope, you are wrong!
</p>
<p>Me: How do you figure?&nbsp;</p>
<p>E: Because he is not the descendant of slaves.</p>
<p>Me: HA!!</p>
<p>E: He is not Black. He is African.
</p>
<p>Me: You know, I could actually see this argument being used and working!
</p>
<p>E: Of course it would.</p>
<p>Me: Only in America, ehh?
</p>
<p>E: God Bless it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/06/17/obama-and-affirmative-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I love the smell of Propaganda in the morning</title>
		<link>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/06/17/i-love-the-smell-of-propaganda-in-the-morning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/06/17/i-love-the-smell-of-propaganda-in-the-morning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Sandmonkey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[American politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandmonkey.org/?p=4942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Dems are coming out swinging this election, and their online viral propaganda stuff seems to be done much better than their republican counterparts. Check this one out!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dems are coming out swinging this election, and their online viral propaganda stuff seems to be done much better than their republican counterparts. Check <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiQJ9Xp0xxU">this one out!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/06/17/i-love-the-smell-of-propaganda-in-the-morning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama and AIPAC</title>
		<link>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/06/05/obama-and-aipac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/06/05/obama-and-aipac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Sandmonkey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[American politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The JOOOZ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/06/05/obama-and-aipac/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Me and Lisa   on Gchat!

Lisa: i&#39;m watching Obama. he gives good speech.

5:46 PM me: yes

  he is very well spoken

   

5:47 PM Lisa: mccain&#39;s wife gives me the creeps

  she&#39;s so blonde and toothy

  and tightly wound

 me: u hate her cause she is pretty

5:48 PM admit it

 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Me and <a href="http://www.lisagoldman.net/">Lisa</a>   on Gchat!<strong><br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span><strong>Lisa</strong>: i&#39;m watching Obama. he gives good speech.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>5:46 PM </span><strong>me</strong>: yes<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>  </span>he is very well spoken<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>  </span> <img src='http://www.sandmonkey.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>5:47 PM </span><strong>Lisa</strong>: mccain&#39;s wife gives me the creeps<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>  </span>she&#39;s so blonde and toothy<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>  </span>and tightly wound<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span> </span><strong>me</strong>: u hate her cause she is pretty<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>5:48 PM </span>admit it<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>  </span> <img src='http://www.sandmonkey.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span> </span><strong>Lisa</strong>: nah<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span> </span><strong>me</strong>: she is rich<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>  </span>pretty<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span> </span><strong>Lisa</strong>: i&#39;m not that type<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>5:49 PM </span><strong>me</strong>: and has access to percesetts<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><strong>Lisa</strong>: oh god, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/04/clinton-tag-teams-with-ob_n_105168.html">he is drooling over aipac.</a> i want to vomit<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>5:52 PM </span><br />
		</span></p>
<p><span><span> </span><strong>me</strong>: hehe<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>  </span>lol<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>5:53 PM </span><strong>Lisa</strong>: his first speech as the dem nominee has to be to aipac??<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span> </span><strong>me</strong>: yes<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span> </span><strong>Lisa</strong>: god, this is going to feed into the walt mearsheimer tinfoil hat wearing crowd<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span> </span><strong>me</strong>: nahh<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>  </span>cause no one believes it<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>  </span>they just think he is doing it to get elected<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>  </span>everyone knows the blacks hate the Jews<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>  </span> <img src='http://www.sandmonkey.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>5:54 PM </span><strong>Lisa</strong>: he just reminded them of the jewish involvement in freedom summer<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span> </span><strong>me</strong>: then again, who doesn&#39;t?<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>5:56 PM </span><strong>Lisa</strong>: the BBC announcer just said &quot;jewish lobby in the united states&quot; instead of &quot;israel lobby&quot;<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>  </span>they do it all the time and no-one calls them on it<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>  </span>most AIPAC people are Christians, for heaven&#39;s sake<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span> </span><strong>me</strong>: lol<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>  </span>yeah<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span>5:57 PM </span>but the jews pay them to join<br />
</span></p>
<p><span><span> </span><strong>Lisa</strong>: geez, you are part of the conspiracy, aren&#39;t you?<br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/06/05/obama-and-aipac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Democratic Primaries inevtiable conclusion!</title>
		<link>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/05/28/the-democratic-primaries-inevtiable-conclusion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/05/28/the-democratic-primaries-inevtiable-conclusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 08:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Sandmonkey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[American politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Funny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandmonkey.org/?p=4922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2357/2530007913_bbf1cbaf94_o.jpg" alt=" " width="479" height="347" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/05/28/the-democratic-primaries-inevtiable-conclusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Right&#8217;s Obama?</title>
		<link>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/05/14/the-rights-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/05/14/the-rights-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 08:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Sandmonkey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[American politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/05/14/the-rights-obama/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to the US elections this year, you get a sense that for most people it&#39;s a done deal: A democrat is going to win the Presidency this year. And while we can always count on the democrats to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory-the Clinton/Obama brawl anyone?- let&#39;s just be pessimists [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to the US elections this year, you get a sense that for most people it&#39;s a done deal: A democrat is going to win the Presidency this year. And while we can always count on the democrats to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory-the Clinton/Obama brawl anyone?- let&#39;s just be pessimists and submit to the idea that McCain will lose this election, and the republicans- with their brand&#39;s reputation and fundraising is at an all times low- will further lose the house and the Senate. Fine, so are they done for for the next 8 years then? Not bloody likely, and mainly because of their newest star politician: <a href="http://www.bobbyjindal.com/">Bobby Jindal.</a></p>
<p>For those of you who don&#39;t know him, Jindal is the republican governor of Louisiana and a 36 year old Indian-American. The fact that they are polishing his image right now (some are even going as far as calling him &quot;the next Reagan&quot;) with some even dropping hints of his being a VP to McCain, means that someone is thinking ahead in the republican party, and whomever that Lone-worlf is, he is a goddamn Genius. If McCain ran with Jindal as his running mate, a revolution will take place in the american political climate, and it could even affect this current race and tilt it to the republican favor. What am I talking about? I am talking about the entrance of the Indian Immigrant population into the political fray, and how it would change everything.</p>
<p>You see, the american desi population usually stays out of politics, choosing to rather to keep to themselves and concentrate on their work on families. There are millions of them, the majority of which have Upper-middle class life-style, they are capitalists by nature, they have a heavy emphasis on traditional family values in the culture, and complete haters of the illegal immigrant population. In a sense, they are the republican dream voting bloc, and yet not a single politician ever courted them.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Enter Jindal: Young, good looking Indian from both parents, a success story by both American and immigrant Indian standards, all in all a source of pride for the Desi community at large. And if the Desi blogs in America are any indication, THEY LOVE HIM. His candidacy for VP would be a source of pride to the Indian Community, and would politically mobilize this rich but usually apathetic voting population. Not to mention, it would beat the whole &quot;republicans are racist&quot; meme, with them taking on a distinctively non-white population that doesn&#39;t suffer a history of opression in the US and who actually love that country. If they come out for him, and they would, the US political equation will be unbalanced irrevocably. The republicans would in effect be saying to the Democrats: &quot;Oh, you got that black vote now, didja? Good!&nbsp; Keep them. Enjoy their campaign contributions. Oh wait, they rarely donate, don&#39;t they? Well, we got us the Indian votes, and boy do they have deep pockets. Suckaaaaas!&quot;</p>
<p>The republicans should make McCain to pick Jindal even if it costs the earlier to lose the election, because that would be the perfect way to introduce Jindal to the american political stage and getting his name known. If they start having him on TV as their candidate for VP, making him the focus of the party the way the Democrats did with Obama, with the prospects of nominating him for President in 4 years, then they just locked themselves the indian vote and support throughout the coming two elections at least. Not something to laugh at.</p>
<p>Add to that the geopolitical ramification of a Jindal presidency: He would very likely bring India and the US closer together, forming an alliance that would be crucial for the survival of the US as a world power for the coming decades. The Chinese are becoming too big for the US to keep back on their own, and the Russians- aided by Venezuela, North Korea, Iran and every other despotic regime in the world- are too busy finding new ways to stab the US in the back, while the Europeans &quot;allies&quot; are being useless as usual, with half of them wishing to see the day where &quot;the US is humbled&quot;, just like they are. An Alliance with India- given their common attributes of Language, democratic values, reverence for capitalism, secularism and history of fighting islamist terrorism- would be the most logical move for the US in the current political climate, and would probably benefit them greatly in the long run, espeically that the two new up and coming world powers are India and China, and they both despise each other, and the US adminstration knowing that a confrontation with China will eventaully become inevtiable. If you are going to piss off a Nuclear Giant like China, you best have one of your own, and in this case that would be India.</p>
<p>This is all, of course, all premature. McCain didn&#39;t choose his VP yet, and it&#39;s very possible that it might not be Jindal. But boy oh boy, if he does choose him! Now <em><strong>That</strong></em> would be change!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/05/14/the-rights-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Hillary can still win</title>
		<link>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/04/21/how-hillary-can-still-win/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/04/21/how-hillary-can-still-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Sandmonkey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[American politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Funny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/04/21/how-hillary-can-still-win/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well&#8230;..
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=uBGyuYKlxIg">Well&#8230;..</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sandmonkey.org/2008/04/21/how-hillary-can-still-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
